X

Vous n'êtes pas connecté

  - RENEWECONOMY.COM.AU - Comments Feed - 23/Feb 08:17

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #3: Hide the costs of keeping coal by Alan C

In reply to <a href="https://reneweconomy.com.au/peter-duttons-nuclear-accounting-trick-3-hide-the-costs-of-keeping-coal/#comment-176935">Truth Missile</a>. Egads... I had not noticed. If they amortized it over 50 years... how MUCH did they add in for the refurb after 30... When CSIRO examined such things the cost to go longer than 30 years of that refurb was so much it id not even lower the average cost per MWH by much. So don't tell me I will guess. They did not mention, in their additions, the relative emissions costs, so I expect they will also not have counted refurb costs. Much like waste disposal, gov nuke regulatory body, insurance were all free too.

Articles similaires

Sorry! Image not available at this time

Comment on Marinus costs blow out to more than $5 billion, but backers insist it is still value for money by Rob

reneweconomy.com.au - 11/Jul 01:01

The price increase trend from $ 6.7 billion for 2 cables in 2023 to $5 billion for 1 cable in 2025 is a concern. Especially with the rapidly dropping...

Sorry! Image not available at this time

Comment on Marinus costs blow out to more than $5 billion, but backers insist it is still value for money by Rob

reneweconomy.com.au - 11/Jul 01:01

The price increase trend from $ 6.7 billion for 2 cables in 2023 to $5 billion for 1 cable in 2025 is a concern. Especially with the rapidly dropping...

Latest releases

  • Aucun élément