Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #3: Hide the costs of keeping coal by Alan C

In reply to <a href="https://reneweconomy.com.au/peter-duttons-nuclear-accounting-trick-3-hide-the-costs-of-keeping-coal/#comment-176935">Truth Missile</a>. Egads... I had not noticed. If they amortized it over 50 years... how MUCH did they add in for the refurb after 30... When CSIRO examined such things the cost to go longer than 30 years of that refurb was so much it id not even lower the average cost per MWH by much. So don't tell me I will guess. They did not mention, in their additions, the relative emissions costs, so I expect they will also not have counted refurb costs. Much like waste disposal, gov nuke regulatory body, insurance were all free too.

Rubriques :

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #3: Hide the costs of keeping coal by Alan C

Articles similaires

Comment on Queensland LNP flags “call-ins” for two giant battery storage projects, in latest attack on renewable transition by Craig Fryer

Comment on Queensland LNP flags “call-ins” for two giant battery storage projects, in latest attack on renewable transition by Craig Fryer

Comment on Ontario utility wants to double the asking price of nuclear, while US wants reactors on the moon by Glynn Palmer

Comment on Record year for renewables eases prices and pollution as coal clunkers go missing in Queensland by Paul Barnes

Comment on Record year for renewables eases prices and pollution as coal clunkers go missing in Queensland by Paul Barnes

Comment on Home battery installations will match the scale of Snowy Hydro scheme – in a single year by Craig Fryer

Comment on Home battery installations will match the scale of Snowy Hydro scheme – in a single year by Craig Fryer

Comment on Ontario utility wants to double the asking price of nuclear, while US wants reactors on the moon by spicelab

Comment on Last of 1,500 steel towers in Australia’s largest transmission project erected finally erected by Paul Barnes

Comment on Ontario utility wants to double the asking price of nuclear, while US wants reactors on the moon by Paul Barnes

Les derniers communiqués