Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #3: Hide the costs of keeping coal by Alan C

In reply to <a href="https://reneweconomy.com.au/peter-duttons-nuclear-accounting-trick-3-hide-the-costs-of-keeping-coal/#comment-176935">Truth Missile</a>. Egads... I had not noticed. If they amortized it over 50 years... how MUCH did they add in for the refurb after 30... When CSIRO examined such things the cost to go longer than 30 years of that refurb was so much it id not even lower the average cost per MWH by much. So don't tell me I will guess. They did not mention, in their additions, the relative emissions costs, so I expect they will also not have counted refurb costs. Much like waste disposal, gov nuke regulatory body, insurance were all free too.

Rubriques :

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #3: Hide the costs of keeping coal by Alan C

Articles similaires

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #4: Assume climate change has no cost by Stalga

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #1: Assume you can halve the cost of nuclear power by Nicholas Geary

Comment on The four accounting tricks behind Peter Dutton’s nuclear cost claims by Alan C

Comment on The four accounting tricks behind Peter Dutton’s nuclear cost claims by Alan C

Comment on The four accounting tricks behind Peter Dutton’s nuclear cost claims by Alan C

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #4: Assume climate change has no cost by Alan C

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #4: Assume climate change has no cost by Pauly

Comment on South Australia wind project gets planning approval after swapping to fewer but taller turbines by Paul Barnes

Comment on If China can’t scale nuclear, Australia’s got Buckley’s by David P

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear plan could blow out household electricity bills by up to $600 a year by 2030 by ross nicholson

Les derniers communiqués