Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #3: Hide the costs of keeping coal by Alan C

In reply to <a href="https://reneweconomy.com.au/peter-duttons-nuclear-accounting-trick-3-hide-the-costs-of-keeping-coal/#comment-176935">Truth Missile</a>. Egads... I had not noticed. If they amortized it over 50 years... how MUCH did they add in for the refurb after 30... When CSIRO examined such things the cost to go longer than 30 years of that refurb was so much it id not even lower the average cost per MWH by much. So don't tell me I will guess. They did not mention, in their additions, the relative emissions costs, so I expect they will also not have counted refurb costs. Much like waste disposal, gov nuke regulatory body, insurance were all free too.

Rubriques :

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #3: Hide the costs of keeping coal by Alan C

Articles similaires

Comment on The direction of China’s coal journey is clear – the pace remains the question by lfarmed

Comment on How renewables and EVs can shield Australia from the economic fallout of Trump’s war by Stan Holmes

Comment on Higher fixed network tariffs could erase the benefits of the Cheaper Home Batteries rebate by OB

Comment on Electrifying all road freight between Sydney and Melbourne is a no brainer: The payback is less than 4 years by Colin Nicholson

Comment on The direction of China’s coal journey is clear – the pace remains the question by Craig Fryer

Comment on The direction of China’s coal journey is clear – the pace remains the question by Craig Fryer

Comment on Contested Tasmania wind project secures federal green tick after six-plus years in EPBC queue by Tom Sjolund

Comment on Higher fixed network tariffs could erase the benefits of the Cheaper Home Batteries rebate by dash pool

Comment on The direction of China’s coal journey is clear – the pace remains the question by Offbeat Tom

Comment on Balcony solar takes US by storm, as 27 states announce new plug-and-play PV laws by drgrieve

Les derniers communiqués