- EURASIAREVIEW.COM - A la une - 17/Jul 00:02

Trump’s About-Face On Ukraine – OpEd

He promised to end the war in 24 hours. He made nice with Russian President Vladimir Putin and parroted Kremlin talking points. He humiliated Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky in front of the cameras in the Oval Office. He refused to send more weapons to Ukraine. But that was the old Donald Trump. The new Donald Trump is pissed off that Russia hasn’t taken his generous offer of peace. The new Donald Trump admits that Putin pulled a fast one. “I believed he was someone who meant what he said,” Trump confesses, echoing the earlier gullibility of George W. Bush who’d gushed that he could get a sense of Putin’s soul. “He can speak beautifully, but then he bombs people at night. We don’t like that.” When the new Donald Trump shifts to the royal “we,” it’s a sign of profound disappointment. So, now, the United States is readying a new package of military support for Ukraine that includes both defensive and offensive weaponry. Meanwhile, Congress is considering bipartisan legislation that would authorize the president to levy a 500 percent tariff on any country still buying fossil fuels or uranium from Russia. Trump has scaled back that threat to 100 percent while imposing a 50-day deadline for Russia and Ukraine to sign a deal. Is this all a theatrical ploy to push Russia to the negotiating table and compromise? Or is this a decisive break between Trump and Putin, comparable to the recent split between the president and Elon Musk? The one constant, of course, is this: don’t trust the U.S. president. He doesn’t think with his brain or even with his gut. He is moved by his gallbladder, and right now Putin is the object of his bile. Here’s the problem: Putin feels the same way toward Ukraine. Putin’s Intransigence Back in April, when I last wrote about the war, Putin was looking at a pretty good deal. The Ukrainian government was willing to consider territorial compromise. Trump was eager to reestablish economic relations with Russia. NATO membership for Ukraine was off the table, and the U.S. government wasn’t supplying Kyiv with any new weapons (much less any security guarantees). But when the opportunity arose in May to meet with Zelensky in Istanbul, Putin didn’t show up. More troubling, he didn’t pivot from his maximalist demands. Ukraine would have to give up territory it still controlled in the four provinces Russia had formally annexed. To achieve a “comprehensive peace,” Ukraine would also have to reduce its military, ban any third-party forces on its soil, and dissolve “nationalist groups.” To add insult to injury, Ukraine would have to give up any claims for compensation for the damage that Russia has caused. The easy explanation for Putin’s intransigence is his belief that he can win on the battlefield. Russian forces have moved slowly but surely westward. The Ukrainian forces that seized a slice of Russian territory have been expelled. The Kremlin seems to have an unlimited number of drones and missiles with which to pummel Ukrainian cities and infrastructure. Not long ago, Russia launched a record 477 drones, which it then quickly surpassed with 550 drones. Last week, 728 drones entered Ukrainian airspace. By September, Russia will likely be able to launch a thousand drones at a time, and civilian casualties in Ukraine are rising. But any optimism in the Kremlin runs up against some challenging realities, even before Trump’s about-face is factored in and those heavy tariffs start biting. Let’s start with the math. Russian Reasons Not to be Cheerful If Russian troops keep up their modest pace of land seizure—and that’s a big if—they will complete their occupation of the four Ukrainian provinces that the Kremlin has already claimed…in February 2028. To occupy all of Ukraine would take 89 years. The Russian public is getting antsy, with only a minority supporting a war to dislodge Zelensky. Their grandchildren are going to be even unhappier if they are still sacrificing on behalf of a forever war in Ukraine. Those sacrifices include over a million Russian casualties since the full-scale invasion in 2022. The daily casualty rate has nearly doubled from 2023 (693) to the first half of 2025 (1,286). That’s nearly half a million casualties a year. At this rate, Russia will sustain another 1.5 million casualties just to take the rest of those four provinces. The Russian economy, meanwhile, is hurting, has been hurting, will probably continue to hurt after hostilities cease. As Georgi Kantchev writes in the Wall Street Journal, Manufacturing activity is declining, consumers are tightening their belts, inflation remains high and the budget is strained. Russian officials are now openly warning of the risks of a recession, and companies from tractor producers to furniture makers are reducing output. The central bank said Thursday that it would debate cutting its benchmark interest rate later this month after lowering it in June. When the war eventually ends, even if a compensation package is not on the table, Russians will have to pay the bill for the war. And the opportunity costs of spending money on drones and bullets, instead of modernizing factories and diversifying away from fossil fuel exports, will ensure that the Russian economy remains stuck in the twentieth century. Then there are the military setbacks Ukraine is inflicting. Most recently, an attack on a Russian ammunition depot in occupied Donetsk yielded spectacular results by removing much of the firepower that Russia was relying on for its summer offensive. After an earlier strike killed the commander of the Eighth Army, Russian forces in Donetsk “now face a grim reality: no shells, no missiles, and no one to lead them,” writes Chuck Pfarrer in the Kiev Post. “Among the destroyed munitions was Russia’s principal storage point for Surface-to-Air Missiles in Ukraine. Earlier, with Operation Spiderweb, Ukrainian drones ranged far across Russia, even to the Olenya airbase in the Arctic more than 1,200 miles away, to destroy one-third of the c...