Maroc - EURASIAREVIEW.COM - A la une - 14/Sep 23:20

The Future Of Global Peace: Why The UNSC Needs Comprehensive Reform – Analysis

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has long been considered to be the foundation of global peace and security. However, its existing structure reflects a post-World War II order that no longer aligns with current geopolitical realities. As the world becomes more multipolar and new powers emerge, reforming the UNSC has become an undeniable necessity.  One specific proposal to address the historical imbalance in global representation is the United States' recent suggestion to grant permanent seats on the Security Council to two African countries. However, this proposal is met with resistance from other permanent UNSC members, namely China, Russia, the United Kingdom, and France. Each of these countries has vested interests in maintaining their current influence and thus objects to the proposed reform.  This essay aims to examine the challenges faced by the reform of the UNSC, analyze the objections raised by key powers, explore alternative reform proposals for 2024, and ultimately propose a gradual yet comprehensive strategy for a Security Council that is fairer and more effective.  The central issue with the current structure of the UNSC lies in its exclusionary nature. The five permanent members (P5) - the United States, China, Russia, the United Kingdom, and France - possess veto power, granting them disproportionate control over global security decisions. This structure was established in 1945 when the world was dominated by European colonial powers and the Cold War superpowers. However, times have changed. Emerging economies such as Brazil, India, and South Africa now wield significant influence, while Africa, with over a billion people, lacks permanent representation on the council. The excessive power of the P5 often leads to gridlock in decision-making, as evidenced by their frequent use of vetoes to block resolutions on critical issues such as the Syrian Civil War, the conflict in Ukraine, and humanitarian interventions. The urgency for reform arises from these factors, as they undermine the legitimacy and effectiveness of the UNSC in its role as a protector of global peace. The U.S. proposal to grant permanent seats to two African nations aims to redress this historical imbalance. Africa's growing economic, political, and demographic importance positions it as a significant player in global governance. Consequently, the inclusion of African nations could introduce a more nuanced perspective on peace, security, and development issues that disproportionately impact the continent. Potential candidates for permanent membership, such as Nigeria, South Africa, or Egypt, have played substantial roles in regional security and would likely advocate strongly for the interests of the Global South. Nonetheless, this proposal is not without its challenges.   One of the main obstacles to reform lies in the anticipated opposition from other permanent members of the Security Council. For instance, China is expected to object based on its increasing influence in Africa. This can be seen through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which has fostered strong economic ties with African nations. China may be concerned that including African countries in the P5 would diminish its leverage on the continent. Furthermore, China's overall foreign policy emphasises non-interference, and any reform that alters the status quo could be seen as a threat to its strategic interests. Similarly, Russia is unlikely to support reforms that broaden the council's membership, as it has utilised its veto power to uphold its influence over global security matters, particularly in regions such as the Middle East and Eastern Europe. Expanding the UNSC to include new permanent members, whether from Africa or elsewhere, could erode Russia's ability to unilaterally block resolutions that do not align with its geopolitical objectives. The UK and France, although less resistant, may have mixed perspectives on the U.S. proposal. The UK, with its historical connections to several African nations through the Commonwealth, might be more amenable to increased African representation. France, with its sway over former colonies in West and Central Africa, may share this sentiment but lean towards a more comprehensive approach to UNSC reform. Both nations, however, would be cautious of reforms that diminish their strategic influence or lead to an unwieldy council that struggles to make prompt decisions. Therefore, while the U.S. proposal signifies a significant step towards inclusivity, the geopolitical calculations of the P5 members pose a substantial barrier to its realisation. In addition to the proposal for African permanent seats, there have been other reform initiatives circulating. Notably, there have been calls to expand permanent membership to include nations such as India, Brazil, Germany, and Japan - collectively known as the G4 nations. These countries have long argued that their economic and political contributions to global affairs justify their inclusion as permanent members. For instance, India, as the world's most populous democracy and a major player in South Asia, demonstrates a strong rationale for inclusion. Similarly, Brazil holds significant influence in Latin America. Japan and Germany, despite their economic prowess and active diplomacy, have been excluded from the P5 due to their roles in World War II. Expanding the council to include these nations would enhance regional representation and better reflect the current global balance of power. Another prominent proposition for the reformation of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) revolves around the veto system. At present, any of the five permanent members of the Security Council (the P5) possess the ability to exercise a veto, thereby effectively obstructing the passage of a resolution. This power has been a major source of disagreement as it has frequently resulted in deadlock concerning significant security matters. France has advocated for a reform that would restrict the use of the veto in cases involving atrocities, such as genocide or war crimes. France contends that humanitarian concerns should take precedence over national interests. This proposal has gained considerable support, particularly among the non-permanent members of the United Nations (UN). However, it faces staunch opposition from Russia and China, both of whom have employed their veto power to shield their allies from international intervention. Another concept that is gaining momentum is the call for regional representation within the UNSC. This would entail allocating permanent seats to regional groups such as the African Union, the Arab League, or the Pacific Islands Forum. Such an approach could resolve some of the dilemmas regarding which specific countries should be chosen to represent larger regions. However, this model also raises concerns about how to ensure effective leadership and decision-making within these regions, as well as how to strike a balance between regional representation and the necessity for global consensus. Considering the numerous challenges confronting the reform of the UNSC, it may be most feasible to pursue a gradual and practical approach. The US proposal to bestow two permanent seats to African nations is a step in the right direction but should be accompanied by a broader expansion that includes the G4 nations and potentially other regions. Furthermore, reforms to the veto system, such as restrictive measures in cases of humanitarian crises, should be pursued alongside efforts to enhance the influence of the non-permanent members. Bolstering the role of non-permanent members, for instance, by extending their terms or augmenting their involvement in critical decisions, could render the council more democratic and accountable without compromising its ability to respond promptly in times of crisis. In conclusion, while the US proposition to reform the UNSC by adding two African permanent members represents a meaningful endeavour to address global imbalances in representation, it faces substantial obstacles from the existing P5 members, particularly China and Russia. It will be necessary to undertake comprehensive reform, including expanding permanent membership to other regions and adjusting the veto system, to establish a more equitable and effective Security Council. However, accomplishing such changes will require delicate negotiations and concessions from all major powers. The future of global security governance depends on the ability of the international community to surmount these challenges and create a more inclusive, transparent, and functional Security Council. The opinions expressed in this article are the author's own. References Malone, David M. The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2004. Kennedy, Paul, and Bruce Russett. "Reforming the United Nations." Foreign Affairs, vol. 74, no. 5, 1995, pp. 56–71. Luck, Edward C. UN Security Council: Practice and Promise. Routledge, 2006. Weiss, Thomas G., and Sam Daws, eds. The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations. Oxford University Press, 2007. Albright, Madeleine K. "The Future of the UN Security Council." Foreign Affairs, vol. 98, no. 1, 2019, pp. 54–67.