For years, the idea of geoengineering—artificially lowering global temperatures through technological means—has been met with skepticism. Only a...
Vous n'êtes pas connecté
- English
- Français
- عربي
- Español
- Deutsch
- Português
- русский язык
- Català
- Italiano
- Nederlands, Vlaams
- Norsk
- فارسی
- বাংলা
- اردو
- Azərbaycan dili
- Bahasa Indonesia
- Հայերեն
- Ελληνικά
- Bosanski jezik
- українська мова
- Íslenska
- Türkmen, Түркмен
- Türkçe
- Shqip
- Eesti keel
- magyar
- Қазақ тілі
- Kalaallisut ; kalaallit oqaasii
- Lietuvių kalba
- Latviešu valoda
- македонски јазик
- Монгол
- Bahasa Melayu ; بهاس ملايو
- ဗမာစာ
- Slovenščina
- тоҷикӣ ; toğikī ; تاجیکی
- ไทย
- O'zbek ; Ўзбек ; أۇزبېك
- Tiếng Việt
- ភាសាខ្មែរ
- རྫོང་ཁ
- Soomaaliga ; af Soomaali
Rubriques :
Maroc - WN.COM - Science - Hier 13:34
The Real Fight Over Geoengineering Is Beginning
For years, the idea of geoengineering—artificially lowering global temperatures through technological means—has been met with skepticism. Only a handful of dedicated and much-criticized scientists have argued for researching it at all, and when others weighed in, it was generally to trash the idea. This September, in a study published in the journal Frontiers in Science, more than 40 experts in climate change, polar geosciences, and ocean patterns warned that geoengineering was extremely unlikely to work and likely to have dangerous consequences. Spraying reflective aerosols into the atmosphere to deflect the sun’s heat, could, for instance, “cause stratospheric heating, which may alter...
Articles similaires
ROTHENBURGER – Are two-thirds of Canadians really ‘morbid denialists’?
armchairmayor.ca - 19/Nov 23:38
I submit that there is a big difference between denialism and skepticism, and between hate speech and free speech ONCE AGAIN, the “denialism” word...
ROTHENBURGER – Are two-thirds of Canadians really ‘morbid denialists’?
armchairmayor.ca - 19/Nov 23:38
I submit that there is a big difference between denialism and skepticism, and between hate speech and free speech ONCE AGAIN, the “denialism” word...
Republicans Tried to Squelch the Epstein Furor. Instead, They Fed It.
the new york times - 14/Nov 01:26
A House investigation that the G.O.P. has tried to use to deflect calls for more transparency has yielded striking revelations that have only fueled...
Republicans Tried to Squelch the Epstein Furor. Instead, They Fed It.
the new york times - 14/Nov 01:26
A House investigation that the G.O.P. has tried to use to deflect calls for more transparency has yielded striking revelations that have only fueled...
'Hoax will backfire!' Trump trashes Dems as he signs Epstein bill
rawstory.com - 20/Nov 01:40
President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday evening in a lengthy Truth Social post that, after months of having opposed the bill and fruitlessly...
'Hoax will backfire!' Trump trashes Dems as he signs Epstein bill
rawstory.com - 20/Nov 01:40
President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday evening in a lengthy Truth Social post that, after months of having opposed the bill and fruitlessly...
Artificial intelligence sparks debate at COP30 climate talks in Brazil
wn.com - 18/Nov 22:37
By ANTON L. DELGADO, Associated Press BELEM, Brazil (AP) — At the U.N. climate talks in Brazil, artificial intelligence is being cast as both a hero...
Raccoons are evolving to be as cute and cuddly as pets — and they want ...
wn.com - 21/Nov 21:58
The days of trash-talking raccoons may be coming to an end. A new study published in the journal Frontiers in Zoology found that city-dwelling...
Raccoons are evolving to be as cute and cuddly as pets — and they want ...
wn.com - 21/Nov 21:58
The days of trash-talking raccoons may be coming to an end. A new study published in the journal Frontiers in Zoology found that city-dwelling...