Coat of arms part of history

THE EDITOR: Instead of removing Columbus's ships from the coat of arms and replacing them with the steelpan, Prime Minister Rowley should focus on removing himself and the PNM government from the lives of the people of TT once and for all. For 62 years the depictions of Columbus’s ships – the Nina, the Pinta and the Santa Maria – have been part of our national symbol, commemorating his arrival in 1498. Now Dr Rowley has decided these symbols should be removed, as announced at the PNM’s special convention on August 18. This move comes as a distraction from the real issues plaguing our nation: rampant crime, rising poverty, persistent injustice, systemic inequality, and financial scandals that have become hallmarks of the PNM's leadership. Rather than focusing on superficial changes to our coat of arms, the Prime Minister should prioritise addressing the critical challenges that are dragging this country down. The coat of arms, designed in 1962 by a committee that included the late Carnival designer George Bailey, is a reflection of our history. It should not be altered to suit the political whims of the day. If Rowley is truly committed to the well-being of TT, he should consider stepping aside, allowing for new leadership that can steer the country towards progress, equality and justice. CURTIS A OBRADY Arima The post Coat of arms part of history appeared first on Trinidad and Tobago Newsday.

Rubriques :

Coat of arms part of history

Articles similaires

Ships symbols of our journey

The coat of arms debate

The coat of arms pandemonium

So, remove PMs from history?

The emperor’s new coat of arms

Senator Maharaj: People losing hope for change

Discussion vital on all coat of arms elements

Who else to blame, Dr Rowley?

Put heroes on money

Put heroes on money

Les derniers communiqués