Rubriques :

Maroc - RENEWECONOMY.COM.AU - Comments Feed - Hier 10:27

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #3: Hide the costs of keeping coal by Truth Missile

In reply to <a href="https://reneweconomy.com.au/peter-duttons-nuclear-accounting-trick-3-hide-the-costs-of-keeping-coal/#comment-176907">Lawrence</a>. I have. The LNP reduce the “sticker shock” by amortizing the cost of their nukes over 50 years, but we only see reported half the costs, those up to 2051/52. That’s the $331 Bn. Which itself is a absurdly undercooked number for a whole variety of reasons, some of which have been covered in these articles.

Rubriques :

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #3: Hide the costs of keeping coal by Truth Missile

Articles similaires

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #3: Hide the costs of keeping coal by richard warren

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #1: Assume you can halve the cost of nuclear power by David D

Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #3: Hide the costs of keeping coal

Comment on The four accounting tricks behind Peter Dutton’s nuclear cost claims by John Holmes

Comment on The four accounting tricks behind Peter Dutton’s nuclear cost claims by John Holmes

Comment on The four accounting tricks behind Peter Dutton’s nuclear cost claims by John Holmes

Comment on Peter Dutton’s nuclear accounting trick #1: Assume you can halve the cost of nuclear power by Stan Holmes

Comment on The four accounting tricks behind Peter Dutton’s nuclear cost claims by David D

Comment on The four accounting tricks behind Peter Dutton’s nuclear cost claims by John Holmes

Comment on The four accounting tricks behind Peter Dutton’s nuclear cost claims by John Holmes

Les derniers communiqués