In an extraordinary twist that has upended an already unpredictable election, the world's richest man has become Donald Trump's most influential...
Vous n'êtes pas connecté
Lies on Elon Musk’s X have instigated some of the worst racial riots in Britain’s history. Musk recently posted a comment to his hundreds of millions of followers claiming “Civil war is inevitable” in the U.K., and asserted that the British criminal justice system treats Muslims more leniently than far-right activists. European Union commissioner Thierry Breton sent Musk an open letter reminding him of EU laws against amplifying harmful content “that promotes hatred, disorder, incitement to violence, or certain instances of disinformation” and warning that the EU “will be extremely vigilant” about protecting “EU citizens from serious harm.” Musk’s response was a meme that said: “TAKE A BIG STEP BACK AND LITERALLY, F*CK YOUR OWN FACE!” As I noted last week, Americans, too, are being subject to lies and bigotry on Musk’s X — and not just because Musk fired the entire staff that had been keeping such filth off the platform; Musk is also reposting and encouraging some of it. Musk recently released an AI chatbot that falsely told tens of millions of Americans that “the ballot deadline has passed” in several swing states, including the battlegrounds of Michigan, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania, among others. Secretaries of state in five states urged Musk to “immediately implement changes” to his chatbot, but Musk hasn’t done so. Evidence is mounting that Russia and other foreign agents are using X todisruptthis year’s presidential race, presumably in favor of Trump. Musk refuses to take any action. What to do about Musk? I’ve suggested that advertisers boycott X. Now Musk is suing advertisers for doing this, arguing that they’re violating antitrust laws. It’s time to get tough with Musk. Here are some suggestions. First, the Federal Trade Commission should demand that Musk take down lies that are likely to endanger individuals or threaten our democracy, and if he does not, sue him underSection 5 of the FTC Act. Musk’s free-speech rights under the First Amendment don’t take precedence over the public interest. Seven weeks ago, the Supreme Courtsaidfederal agencies may pressure social media platforms to take down misinformation — a technical win for the public good (technical because the court based its ruling on the plaintiff’s lack of standing to sue). The U.S. government — and we taxpayers — have additional power over Musk, if we’re willing to use it: The U.S. should terminate its contracts with him, starting with Musk’s SpaceX. In 2021, the United States entered into a $1.8 billion classified contract with SpaceX that includes blasting off classified and military satellites,according toThe Wall Street Journal. The funds are now an important part of SpaceX’s revenue. The Pentagon has also contracted with SpaceX’s Starlink broadband service to pay for internet links, despite Musk’srefusalin September 2022 to allowUkraineto use Starlink to launch an attack on Russian forces in Crimea. Last August, the Pentagon gave SpaceX’s Starshield unit $70 million to provide communications services to dozens of Pentagon partners. Meanwhile, SpaceX is cornering the rocket launch market. Its rockets were responsible for two-thirds of flights from American launch sites in 2022 and handled 88 percent in the first six months of this year. SpaceX is also the only entity ferrying NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station. In deciding upon which private-sector entities to contract with, the U.S. government considers the contractor’s reliability. Musk’s mercurial, impulsive temperament makes him and the companies he heads unreliable. The government also considers whether it is contributing to a monopoly. Musk’s SpaceX is fast becoming one. Why is the U.S. government allowing Musk’s satellites and rocket launchers to become crucial to the nation’s security when he’s shown utter disregard for the public interest? Why give Musk more economic power when he repeatedly abuses it and demonstrates contempt for the public good? There is no good reason. American taxpayers should stop subsidizing Elon Musk. Stop. Him. Now. This article was published at Robert Reich's Substack
In an extraordinary twist that has upended an already unpredictable election, the world's richest man has become Donald Trump's most influential...
Head of the American space agency NASA, Bill Nelson, has called for an investigation into possible contacts between SpaceX founder Elon Musk and...
Washington: What level of impact can the world’s richest individual wield over one of the oldest democracies? The upcoming elections will not only...
Calling reports of ongoing conversations between tech billionaire Elon Musk and Russian President Vladimir Putin “concerning,” the head of NASA on...
Last week I saw a somewhat shabbily dressed man in the pharmacy trying to get a Covid booster. They told him it would cost $130. (It was the Moderna...
Leaked online chats from a prominent pro-Trump group of "poll watchers" reveal close ties to an infamous armed militia movement, reported The Guardian...
Elon Musk, the billionaire owner of major government contractor SpaceX and a key ally of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, has been in...
The Pentagon needs what the company offers to compete with China even as it frets over its potential for dominance and the billionaire’s global...
WASHINGTON — As an exceedingly bitter, tight and dark campaign for the presidency moves into its last moments, apprehensive election officials and...
Belizeans and companies are divided over the Public Utilities Commission’s (PUC) consideration of an internet license for Elon Musk’s Starlink....