Republicans have pulled off a coup against an entire branch of government, and nobody seems to have noticed. But if you pay attention, it’s...
Vous n'êtes pas connecté
Recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings can be beaten at a state level, an expert told Slate Tuesday — but it will take a lot of work.Slate's report outlined how states can put in place their own laws to effectively bypass rulings put in place by the U.S. Supreme Court.One ruling cited effectively made homeless encampments illegal. There are also laws the court left in place that allow "life without parole" for youth in Arizona.Read Also: Time to fight a lawless Supreme CourtSlate quoted law professor Rachel Barkow, who call the Supreme Court “the court of mass incarceration.”The report stated that the problem is that the rulings sidestep the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution, which deal with cruel and unusual punishment, and a clear constitutional ban on extreme punishments for children. Fifty-five years ago, Illinois held a Constitutional Convention to write the strongest law protecting people from "extreme and vengeful punishments," rather than the "cruel and unusual" punishments cited in the U.S. Constitution. It became known as the "proportionate penalties clause."It was a response to the Civil Rights Movement opposing violence by police and unjust incarceration. During the convention, civil rights activist Leonard Foster suggested, “In addition to looking to the act that the person committed, we also should look at the person who committed the act and determine to what extent he can be restored to useful citizenship.”His suggestion would apply to both the courts and the legislature. In Arizona, the state Constitution “insisted that punishment must serve the goals of reform and rehabilitation, believing that public safety was better served by helping people return to society. Any punishment that forgoes these ideals — including death, needlessly long prison sentences, and brutal conditions of confinement — is unconstitutional.”Pennsylvania banned “cruel” punishments in 1790, two years after the U.S. Constitution was ratified. It means state courts can follow their own constitutional language for state crimes and sentences. Slate explained that hasn't been the practice in the past, however, as state courts "unquestioningly abdicated their power as the final arbiters of state constitutions and instead applied federal precedent as their own — an approach that has been largely true even in Arizona, Illinois, and Pennsylvania."The authors concluded that, if the U.S. Supreme Court intends to ignore the Eighth Amendment, state courts should follow their own laws. Read the full piece here.
Republicans have pulled off a coup against an entire branch of government, and nobody seems to have noticed. But if you pay attention, it’s...
Republicans have pulled off a coup against an entire branch of government, and nobody seems to have noticed. But if you pay attention, it’s...
Former President Donald Trump is likely to get some help from the right-wing bloc of the Supreme Court in interfering with the 2024 presidential...
Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, has finally admitted what we knew all along:Facebook conspired with the government to censor individualsexpressing...
It’s not easy being a child in the American police state. Danger lurks around every corner and comes at you from every direction, especially...
It’s not easy being a child in the American police state. Danger lurks around every corner and comes at you from every direction, especially...
A federal lawsuit in Texas against Planned Parenthood has a web of ties to conservative activist Leonard Leo, whose decades-long effort to steer the...
Nicaragua’s regime-aligned Congress approved a law Tuesday empowering domestic courts to pass rulings against people and entities abroad that are...
Donald Trump's legal team has petitioned a federal court to step in on his hush money criminal case, aiming to reverse his conviction and delay...
By Sreeparna Banerjee Thailand is grappling with a surge in political discontent, as the Constitutional Court, under the influence of the...