Research group Bloomberg New Energy Finance says seven reactors would reduce the need for renewables by just a small percentage.
Vous n'êtes pas connecté
Analysis from Bloomberg New Energy Finance says even if nuclear is successfully implemented it would be ‘at least four times’ more expensive than average cost of renewables
Research group Bloomberg New Energy Finance says seven reactors would reduce the need for renewables by just a small percentage.
Research group Bloomberg New Energy Finance says seven reactors would reduce the need for renewables by just a small percentage.
Coalition proposal would cost a minimum of $116bn – the same as Labor’s plan for almost 100% renewables by 2050, the Smart Energy Council says
Uncertainty in Australia's energy policy would endanger investment, as one in five approval requests are for renewable projects, the environment...
The cost of building seven reactors under Peter Dutton's nuclear proposal could be up to $600 billion and deliver just 3.7 per cent of Australia's...
O’Connor MP Rick Wilson has estimated that a small nuclear plant in Collie would cost ‘$5 billion to $7 billion’ – making the reactor 19 times...
Reliable energy, human rights, land impacts, air and water pollution, lost wildlife get ignored This election year, several critical issues...
One of Australia’s foremost voices on energy futures says doing anything other than pursuing renewables with enthusiasm right now is not paying...
With the Bank of Canada finally making a rate cut last month – the first one in over four years – Canada’s realtors say that the country’s...
Will the government’s renewables plan cost $1 trillion? Is nuclear energy cheaper? Can a reactor be up and running by 2037? We answer the nuclear...